Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra Suspended From Office by Court

1 July, 2025

Thailand’s Constitutional Court has suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra from office pending an investigation into alleged ethical misconduct. The case stems from a leaked phone call with a former Cambodian leader regarding a border dispute, which sparked public outrage and accusations of undermining national security. The court voted 7-2 to suspend her while it considers a petition for her removal. The move further destabilizes her administration, which has already seen a key party quit the ruling coalition.

Unpacked:

What led to the border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia?

The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute centers on the Preah Vihear Temple and nearby territory. The International Court of Justice awarded the temple to Cambodia in 1962, but disagreements over adjacent land persist, fueled by historical treaties, ambiguous colonial-era maps, and nationalist sentiments. The dispute has caused military clashes and ongoing diplomatic tension.

What are the possible consequences of the Prime Minister's suspension for Thailand's political stability?

The suspension of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra further destabilizes Thailand’s administration, already weakened by the departure of a key coalition party. This could lead to political gridlock, an erosion of public trust, and potentially trigger new elections or protests as factions vie for power.

Who is the former Cambodian leader involved in the leaked phone call, and why is this significant?

While the summary doesn't specify, the former Cambodian leader is likely Hun Sen, who played a central role in Cambodia’s politics and past disputes with Thailand. His involvement is significant as it touches on sensitive border issues and stirs nationalist concerns in both countries.

How have previous incidents over the Thailand-Cambodia border dispute been handled by both governments?

Both countries have used diplomatic channels, such as the Joint Boundary Commission, and have also appealed to international courts. However, talks often stall, and periods of negotiation are punctuated by sporadic military clashes, reflecting the dispute’s intractability and the influence of strong nationalist sentiment on both sides.