Supreme Court Upholds Secularism, Rejects Plea Against Author Inaugurating Mysuru Dasara

19 September, 2025

The Supreme Court dismissed a petition that challenged the Karnataka government's decision to have Booker Prize-winning author Banu Mushtaq, a Muslim, inaugurate the historic Mysuru Dasara festivities. In a strong affirmation of constitutional values, the court reminded the petitioner of the Preamble, which enshrines secularism, liberty, and fraternity as cardinal national ideals. The ruling reinforces the principle that religious identity should not be a barrier to participation in cultural events, upholding the secular fabric of the nation.

Unpacked:

What is the historical and cultural significance of the Mysuru Dasara festival?

Mysuru Dasara is a centuries-old festival celebrating the victory of good over evil, honoring Goddess Chamundeshwari’s defeat of the demon Mahishasura. Originating during the Vijayanagara Empire in the 14th century, it evolved into a grand royal tradition under the Wodeyars and is now Karnataka’s state festival, blending religious ritual with public celebration and cultural events.

Why did the petition challenge Banu Mushtaq's role in inaugurating the festival?

The petition objected to Banu Mushtaq, a Muslim author, inaugurating a traditionally Hindu festival, implying that her religious identity was inappropriate for the role. This reflects ongoing debates in India over religious participation in public cultural events, despite the secular principles enshrined in the Constitution.

How has the inauguration of Mysuru Dasara been traditionally conducted, and have there been similar controversies in the past?

Traditionally, the festival's inauguration was performed by the Wodeyar royal family or distinguished guests, often with a religious and royal focus. While most inaugurations have been uncontroversial, occasional objections have arisen in modern times over appointments that break with tradition or challenge religious norms.

What constitutional principles did the Supreme Court cite in its ruling, and why are they relevant here?

The Supreme Court cited secularism, liberty, and fraternity from the Preamble of the Constitution. These principles affirm that participation in public and cultural events should not be restricted by religious identity, reinforcing India’s commitment to an inclusive, secular democracy.