Adani Group Files Defamation Suits Against Journalists; Court Issues Notices

16 September, 2025

The Adani Group has filed criminal defamation complaints against journalists Abhisar Sharma and Raju Parulekar, alleging they spread false information linking the conglomerate to a land allotment case in Assam. A Gandhinagar court has issued notices for them to appear on September 20. The complaints cite a YouTube video and social media posts which the company calls "baseless and misleading." The legal action raises concerns about press freedom and corporate litigation against media professionals in India.

Unpacked:

What is the background of the land allotment case in Assam involving the Adani Group?

The land allotment case in Assam refers to allegations that land was improperly allotted to the Adani Group, sparking controversy and media scrutiny. The company denies any wrongdoing. Details of the specific case are not fully elaborated in the news summary, but such cases often involve questions about transparency and government-corporate relations.

Who are Abhisar Sharma and Raju Parulekar, and what roles do they play in Indian journalism?

Abhisar Sharma and Raju Parulekar are Indian journalists known for their critical reporting and commentary on political and corporate issues. Sharma is a prominent television journalist and YouTuber, while Parulekar is a veteran journalist and commentator. Both have reported on issues involving large conglomerates and government policy.

What legal consequences can journalists face if found guilty of criminal defamation in India?

If found guilty of criminal defamation in India, journalists can face imprisonment for up to two years, a fine, or both, under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code. Convictions can also impact their professional reputations and may deter investigative reporting.

Why does this legal action raise concerns about press freedom in India?

Legal actions like criminal defamation suits by powerful corporations against journalists are seen as a threat to press freedom. Critics argue such lawsuits can intimidate journalists, chill investigative reporting, and suppress public-interest journalism, especially when cases are filed in distant locations or involve heavy legal costs.