Supreme Court Declines to Stay Controversial Waqf Amendment Act

15 September, 2025

The Supreme Court has refused to grant a complete stay on the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, which has faced multiple legal challenges. A bench headed by the Chief Justice observed that laws passed by the legislature carry a presumption of constitutionality, and a stay can only be granted in the 'rarest of rare cases.' The court did, however, stay specific provisions, including one limiting the number of non-Muslim members on waqf boards, allowing the broader law to remain in effect.

Unpacked:

What specific provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 did the Supreme Court stay?

The Supreme Court stayed provisions such as the one limiting the number of non-Muslim members on waqf boards, allowing greater inclusivity. Other stayed sections may relate to representation or property claims, but the core law remains in effect.

What are the main objectives of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025?

The Act aims to improve transparency and efficiency in waqf property management, separate trusts from waqf, protect women's rights in family waqf, reduce mandatory contributions, and strengthen governance through technology and audits.

Why has the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 faced legal challenges?

Legal challenges stem from concerns about inclusivity, property rights, increased government involvement, and the treatment of non-Muslim representation and property claims, with critics arguing some amendments may undermine minority rights or due process.

What does the Supreme Court mean by presuming constitutionality for laws passed by the legislature?

Presuming constitutionality means courts assume a law is valid unless it clearly violates constitutional rights. Stays are only granted in exceptional cases, ensuring legislative intent is respected unless there’s compelling evidence of harm or violation.