Karnataka Announces Fresh State-Wide Caste Census to Begin September 22

12 September, 2025

The Karnataka government will conduct a new Social and Educational Survey, or 'caste census', from September 22 to October 7 at an estimated cost of ₹420 crore. The move effectively nullifies a controversial 2015 survey whose findings were never officially released following objections from dominant communities like the Vokkaligas and Lingayats. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah stated the new survey will be conducted scientifically to ascertain the status of the state's 7 crore people, with the report expected by December.

Unpacked:

Why was the 2015 caste census in Karnataka so controversial, and why were its findings never released?

The 2015 caste census became controversial after leaked data suggested dominant communities like Lingayats and Vokkaligas were undercounted, leading to strong objections. Accusations of 'unscientific' methodology and missing signatures prevented official acceptance, and political sensitivities kept the report unpublished for nearly a decade.

What are the main objections raised by dominant communities like the Vokkaligas and Lingayats regarding caste surveys?

Dominant communities argue that previous surveys undercounted their populations and did not enumerate all sub-castes accurately. They claim the methodology was unscientific and that the results could affect their political influence and reservation entitlements.

How might the new survey impact reservation policies and political dynamics in Karnataka?

If the new survey finds changes in the caste-wise population, it could lead to demands for increased reservations for certain groups and alter political alliances. Previous leaks suggested large increases in OBC and Muslim quotas, sparking internal party divisions and backlash from dominant groups.

What steps has the government promised to ensure the new survey is more 'scientific' and credible?

Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has stated the new survey will use scientifically rigorous methods to accurately reflect the status of all communities. This likely includes improved enumeration practices, transparency measures, and third-party monitoring to address past criticisms and build public trust.