Nepal Reverses Social Media Ban After Violent Protests Kill 19

8 September, 2025

The Nepalese government has lifted its ban on 26 social media platforms following violent protests that resulted in at least 19 deaths and hundreds of injuries. The "Gen Z Movement," largely comprising young people, erupted after the government blocked major platforms like Facebook and YouTube. The situation escalated when demonstrators tried to storm parliament, leading to a deadly police crackdown and the resignation of Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak. In response, India has tightened security along the Indo-Nepal border.

Unpacked:

What were the underlying causes of the Gen Z protests beyond the social media ban?

The protests were fueled by widespread frustration over government corruption, nepotism, and economic inequality. Many young people were angered by the visible wealth and privileges of politicians' families, known as the 'Nepo Babies' trend, alongside persistent issues like unemployment and lack of opportunities for youth.

Why did the Nepalese government originally ban the 26 social media platforms?

The government cited non-compliance with new registration rules for social media platforms, aiming to monitor content and address issues like cyber crimes and misinformation. However, critics argued the ban was intended to censor criticism, especially after viral posts exposing political corruption and nepotism.

How did the protests lead to violent clashes and the resignation of the Home Minister?

As protests intensified, demonstrators attempted to storm parliament, prompting a deadly crackdown by police that resulted in at least 19 deaths and hundreds injured. The scale of violence and public outrage pressured Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak to resign from his position.

What impact did these events have on Nepal’s relationship with India?

Following the unrest and violence, India tightened security along its border with Nepal to prevent spillover effects and maintain order. This move reflects concerns over regional stability and possible cross-border movement during the political crisis.