INDIA Bloc to Protest Alleged "Poll Fraud" in Bihar

10 August, 2025

The opposition INDIA bloc is intensifying its campaign against the government, planning a protest march to the Election Commission on Monday over alleged "poll fraud" and a special electoral roll revision in Bihar. Following a strategy meeting, leaders from 25 parties have united to challenge what they term the "vote chori model" of the BJP and the EC. Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge will host a dinner for the bloc's MPs to further consolidate their joint front against perceived electoral manipulation.

Unpacked:

What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar, and why is it controversial?

The SIR is a process by the Election Commission to update Bihar's voter list, aiming to remove deceased, migrated, or duplicate voters and foreign nationals. It's controversial because over 35 lakh names are being dropped, raising fears among opposition parties of mass disenfranchisement just before elections.

What are the main arguments from the government and opposition regarding the voter list revision?

The government and Election Commission argue that the revision cleanses the voter list, ensuring integrity and accuracy by removing ineligible names. The opposition contends that the process is rushed, arbitrary, and could disenfranchise legitimate voters, especially marginalized groups, potentially influencing electoral outcomes.

What legal challenges have been raised against the electoral roll revision, and what constitutional issues are involved?

Petitions before the Supreme Court challenge the SIR as arbitrary and unconstitutional, citing violations of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21. Key legal concerns include due process, the reasonableness of the timeline, and the risk of improper voter deletions.

How might the voter roll revision impact upcoming elections in Bihar?

With over 65 lakh voters reportedly struck off the draft rolls, the revision could significantly affect electoral outcomes by potentially reducing participation among certain demographics. Critics warn this may advantage some parties, prompting calls for greater transparency and judicial oversight.