Indian Champions Forfeit Cricket Match Against Pakistan Citing National Stance

30 July, 2025

The Indian Champions team has refused to play its semifinal match against Pakistan in the World Championship of Legends tournament in Birmingham. The team, comprising former star players like Yuvraj Singh and Harbhajan Singh, cited the nation's official stance against bilateral sporting ties with Pakistan following the recent Pahalgam terror attack. The decision underscores how deep-seated political tensions between the two countries continue to dictate interactions in the international sporting arena.

Unpacked:

What is the historical background of India-Pakistan sporting boycotts?

India and Pakistan have a long history of tense relations stemming from the 1947 Partition, which has fueled one of the world’s most intense sports rivalries. Bilateral sporting events, especially in cricket, are often disrupted or boycotted due to political or security issues, particularly after major conflicts or terror attacks.

What was the immediate trigger for India’s refusal to play Pakistan in this tournament?

The immediate trigger was the recent Pahalgam terror attack, after which the Indian government maintained its stance against bilateral sporting ties with Pakistan. This led the Indian Champions team, supported by sponsors and public sentiment, to withdraw from matches against Pakistan.

How did sponsors and organizers react to India’s withdrawal from the match?

At least one major sponsor, EaseMyTrip, publicly withdrew support from the Indian team’s semi-final, citing that they did not wish to be associated with matches involving Pakistan. Organizers face financial and logistical challenges, as India’s absence affects viewership and revenue.

Have similar boycotts or withdrawals occurred in recent international tournaments?

Yes, India has previously refused to play in bilateral series with Pakistan after terror incidents, and similar actions have occurred in other sports as well. These boycotts are not unprecedented and often reflect the prevailing diplomatic and security climate between the two nations.